Articles

The “sixth sense” in Scolopacidae (Aves, Charadriiformes): an overview and a photographic collection

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Received: 10 October 2025
Published: 3 June 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Scolopacidae are characterized by the presence of sensory pits innervated in the central-apical part of the bill, which allow species belonging to this family to locate prey hidden in mud or water with great precision. Although it is known that all Scolopacidae have these pits, the number has been described for only a few species. The authors examined 139 skulls belonging to 25 Palaearctic species (27% of known species) and present a photographic collection of the upper and lower mandibles, in which the sensory pits are clearly visible, their number varying according to species. The lowest number of pits has been recorded in Phalaropus spp., while the highest number has been recorded in Scolopax rusticola. Finally, for comparison, they present photos of the skulls of one species of Recurvirostridae and one of Burhinidae, which also have a modest number of apical pits in the bill.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Andres K. H. & von Düring M., 1988 – Comparative anatomy of vertebrate electroreceptors. Progress in Brain Research, 74: 113-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63006-X

Aradis A., Lo Verde G. & Massa B., 2019 – Importance of millipedes (Diplopoda) in the autumn-winter diet of Scolopax rusticola. European Zoological Journal, 86: 452-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2019.1611955

Bolze G., 1968 – Anordnung und bau der herbstschenkorperchen in limicolenschnabeln imzusammenhang mit nahrungsfindung. Zoologische Anzeiger, 181: 313-355.

Burton P. J. K., 1974 – Feeding and the feeding apparatus in Waders: a study of anatomy and adaptations in the Charadrii. London: British Museum (Natural History).

Collin S.P., 2010. Electroreception in vertebrates and invertebrates. – In: Encyclopedia of animal behavior. Breed M. D. & Moore J. (eds.). Science Direct. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045337-8.00323-5

Crampton W. G. R., 2019 – Electroreception, electrogenesis and electric signal evolution. Fish Biology, 95: 92-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13922

Cunningham S. J., Alley M. R., Castro I., Potter M. A., Cunningham M. & Pyne M. J., 2010a – Bill morphology of ibises suggests a remote-tactile sensory system for prey detection. Auk, 127: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.09117

Cunningham S. J., Castro I. & Alley M., 2007 – A new prey-detection mechanism for kiwi (Apteryx spp.) suggests convergent evolution between paleognathous and neognathous birds. Journal of Anatomy, 211: 493-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00786.x

Cunningham S. J., Castro I., Jensen T. & Potter M. A., 2010b – Remote touch prey-detection by Madagascar crested ibises Lophotibis cristata urschi. Journal of Avian Biology, 41: 350-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.05138.x

Cunningham S. J., Castro I. & Potter M. A. 2009 – The relative importance of olfaction and remote touch in prey detection by North Island brown kiwis. Animal Behavior, 78: 899-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.015

Cunningham S. J., Corfield J. R., Iwaniuk A. N., Castro I., Alley M. R., Birkhead T. R. & Parsons S. 2013 – The anatomy of the bill tip of Kiwi and associated somatosensory regions of the brain: comparison with shorebirds. PloS One, 8: e80036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080036

de Fouw J., van der Heide T., Oudman T., Maas L. R. M., Piersma T. & van Gils J. A., 2016 – Structurally complex sea grass obstructs the sixth sense of a specialized avian molluscivore. Animal Behavior, 115: 55-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.02.017

del Hojo J., 2020 – All the birds of the world. Barcelona: Lynx Ed.

du Toit C. J., Chinsamy A. & Cunningham S. J. 2020 – Cretaceous origins of the vibrotactile bill-tip organ in birds. Proceedings Royal Society B, 287: 20202322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2322

du Toit C. J., Chinsamy A. & Cunningham S. J., 2022 – Comparative morphology and soft tissue histology of the remote-touch bill-tip organ in three ibis species of differing foraging ecology. Journal of Anatomy, 241: 966-980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13734

du Toit C. J., Chinsamy A. & Cunningham S. J., 2024 – Good vibrations: remote-tactile foraging success of wading birds is positively affected by the water content of substrates they forage in. Journal of Avian Biology, 2024: e03243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.03243

Gerritsen A. & Meiboom A., 1985 – The role of touch in prey density estimation by Calidris alba. Netherland Journal of Zoology, 36: 530-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/002829686X00216

Gottschaldt K., 1985 – Structure and function of avian somatosensory receptors. In: Form and function in birds. King A. S. & McLelland J. (eds.). Academic Press. (pp. 375-461).

Gutiérrez-Ibáñez C., Iwaniuk A. N. & Wylie D. R., 2009 – The independent evolution of the enlargement of the principal sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve in three different groups of birds. Brain Behaviour Evolution, 74: 280-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000270904

Hadley A., 2008 – Combine Z.

Hayman P., Marchant J. & Prater T., 1986 – Shorebirds. An identifcation guide to the waders of the world. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.

Heppleston P. B., 1970 – Anatomical observations on the bill of the Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus occidentalis) in relation to feeding behaviour. Journal of Zoology, 161: 519-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1970.tb02053.x

Hopkins C. D., 2017 – Electroreception. Encyclopedia Britannica. <https://www.britannica.com/science/electroreception>

Hüttner T., von Fersen L., Miersch L., Czech N. U. & Dehnhardt G., 2022 – Behavioral and anatomical evidence for electroreception in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Anatomical Record, 305: 592-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24773

Li Q., Jiang P., Li M., Du J., Sun J., Chen N., Wu Y., Chang Q. & Hu C., 2024 – Structure and Phylogenetic Relationships of Scolopacidae Mitogenomes (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae). Current Issues Molecular Biology, 46: 6186-6198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46060369

Lin C. T., 2022 – Morphology of the feeding apparatus in shorebirds (Charadriiformes): a comparative analysis. Master of Science in Zoology, Massey University, New Zealand.

Martin G. R., Wilson K. J., Wild J. M., Parsons S., Kubke M. F. & Corfield J., 2007 – Kiwi forego vision in the guidance of their nocturnal activities. PLoS One, 2: e198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000198

Mertens J. E. J., Van Roje M., Merckx J. & Dekoninck W., 2017 – The use of low cost compact cameras with focus stacking functionality in entomological digitization projects. Zookeys, 712: 141-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.712.20505

Nebel S., Jackson D. & Elner R., 2005 – Functional association of bill morphology and foraging behaviour in calidrid sandpipers. Animal Biology, 55: 235-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1570756054472818

Newton K. C., Bill A. B. & Kajiura S. M., 2019 – Electroreception in marine fishes: chondrichthyans. Fish Biology, 95: 135-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14068

Piersma T., van Aelst R., Kurk K., Berkhoudt H. & Maas L. R. M., 1998 – A new pressure sensory mechanism for prey detection in birds: the use of principles of seabed dynamics? Proceedings Biological Sciences, 265: 1377-1383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0445

Prater T., Marchant J. & Vuorinen J., 1977 – Guide to the identification and ageing of holarctic waders. B.T.O. Guide 17, Tring.

Schneider E. R., Gracheva E. O. & Bagriantsev S. N., 2016 – Evolutionary specialization of tactile perception in vertebrates. Physiology, 31: 193-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00036.2015

Whitfield D., 1990 – Individual feeding specializations of wintering turnstone Arenaria interpres. Journal of Animal Ecology, 59: 193-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/5168

Wilkens L. A. & Hofmann M .H., 2005 – Behavior of animals with passive, low-frequency electrosensory systems. In: Electroreception. Bullock T. H., Hopkins C. D., Popper A. N. & Fay R. R. (eds.). Springer, New York. (21) (pp. 229-263). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28275-0_9

Zweers G. A. & Gerritsen A. F. C., 1997 – Transitions from pecking to probing mechanisms in waders. Netherland Journal of Zoology, 47: 161-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156854297X00166

How to Cite



The “sixth sense” in Scolopacidae (Aves, Charadriiformes): an overview and a photographic collection. (2026). Rivista Italiana Di Ornitologia, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rio.2026.950