Articles

Protandry in a partially migrant population of the Stonechat (Saxicola rubicola): a field study in the central Apennines (Italy)

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 10 December 2025
110
Views
63
Downloads

Authors

Here I present the results of a 3-year field study on some aspects of spring migration in a partially sedentary population of the stonechat Saxicola rubicola in central Italy. By monitoring all suitable territories daily, including those occupied by resident pairs, I recorded the daily increase in the number of both sexes of stonechats in the study area. As first-day sightings showed themselves to be insufficient to test protandry, the study demonstrates the existence of protandry in the stonechat in the field by calculating the daily male-to-female ratio of immigrant individuals, as typically done at ringing stations, and by analyzing the average arrival dates of males and females while correcting for a slightly male-biased detection. Nevertheless, in apparent contradiction to the sex-biased arrival, about 40% of the stonechats arrived already paired in their breeding territories. For the first time, this fraction of stonechats arriving already paired on the breeding grounds, also reported by other authors, has been better analyzed and shown to be restricted to peak migration. Additionally, the analysis of early male arrival and subsequent female mate acquisition suggested that any correlation was purely coincidental, in contrast with both the rank hypothesis and the mate opportunity hypothesis, proposed to explain the maintenance of protandry. The discussion explores a hypothesis to reconcile these contradictory findings with the protandrous arrival of stonechats at the breeding grounds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Arizaga J. & Barba E., 2009 – Importance of sampling frequency to detect differential timing of migration: a case study with Blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Ardea, 97: 297-304.
Banik M., 2001 – Distinctive behavioural traits of early stages of reproductive cycle in migratory populations of the Common Stonechat (Saxicola torquata (L.)) in Kharkiv region, Ukraine. Programme and abstract book 3rd EOU Conference, 21-25 August 2001, Haren/Groningen, The Netherlands.
Banik M., 2019 – Sharp differences in the timing of male and female spring arrival in the European Stonechat, Saxicola rubicola, and the Whinchat, S. rubetra (Passeriformes, Muscicapidae), in north-eastern Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii, 53: 483-490.
Bibby C. J., Burgess N. D., Hill D. A. & Mustoe S. H., 2000 – Bird census techniques. London: Academic Press.
Brichetti P. & Fracasso G., 2022 – The birds of Italy. Vol.3. Cisticolidae-Icteridae. Latina: Edizioni Belvedere.
Cantos F. J. & Tellería J. L., 1994 – Stopover site fidelity of four migrant Warblers in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Avian Biology, 25: 131-134.
Catry P., Encarnacao V., Araujo A., Fearon P., Fearon A., Armelin M. & Delaloye P., 2004 – Are long-distance migrant passerines faithful to their stopover sites? Journal of Avian Biology, 35: 170-181.
Coppack T. & Pulido F., 2009 – Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 49: 493-506.
Cramp S., 1988 – Handbook of the birds of Europe the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the western palearctic. Vol. V: Tyrant Flycatchers to Thrushes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fasano S. G., Tamietti A., Ferro G., Bandini M., Tibaldi B. & Gruppo inanellatori piemontesi e valdostani, 2018 – L’attività di inanellamento a scopo scientifico in Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta: anni 1974-2016. Parte II. Passeriformi e Ricatture. Tichodroma, 9. <https://www.gpso.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Tichodroma_n9-2018_INNpII.pdf>
Flinks H., Helm B. & Rothery P., 2008 – Plasticity of moult and breeding schedules in migratory European Stonechats Saxicola rubicola. Ibis, 150: 687-697.
Johnson E.D.H., 1961 – The pair relationship and polygyny in the Stonechat. British Birds, 54: 213-225.
Justen H., Hasselmann T., Illera J. C., Delmore K., Serrano D., Flinks H., Senzaki M., Kawamura K., Helm B. & Liedvogel M., 2022 – Population-specific association of Clock gene polymorphism with annual cycle timing in stonechats. Scientific Reports, 12: 7947.
Kokko H., 1999 – Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68: 940-950.
Kokko H., Gunnarsson T. G., Morrell L. J. & Gill J. A., 2006 – Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75: 1293-1303.
Maggini I., Spina F., Voigt C. C., Ferri A. & Bairlein F., 2013 – Differential migration and body condition in northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) at a Mediterranean spring stopover site. Journal of Ornithology, 154: 321-328.
Mildenberger H., 1950 – Beiträge zur Ökologie und Brutbiologie des Schwarzkehlchens (Saxicola torquata rubicola). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 1: 11-20.
Morbey Y. E. & Ydenberg R.C., 2001 – Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecology Letters, 4: 663-673.
Newton I., 2023 – The migration ecology of birds. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
Payevsky V. A., 2024 – Are migrant passerines faithful to their individual paths and migration timing throughout their lives? Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS, 328: 197-203.
Rödl T., 1995 – The wintering of territorial Stonechat pairs Saxicola torquate in Israel. Journal of Ornithology, 136: 423-433.
Rubolini D., Spina F. & Saino N., 2004 – Protandry and sexual dimorphism in trans-Saharan migratory birds. Behavioral Ecology, 15: 592-601.
Saino N., Rubolini D., Serra L., Caprioli M., Morganti M., Ambrosini R. & Spina F., 2010 – Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: a test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2010: 2054-2065.
Spina F., Massi A., Montemaggiori A. & Baccetti N., 1993 – Spring migration across the mediterranean. Vogelwarte, 37: 1-94.
Spina F. & Volponi S., 2008 – Atlante della migrazione degli uccelli in Italia. 2. Passeriformi. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA). Roma: Tipografia SCR.
Stewart R. L. M., Francis C. M. & Massey C., 2002 – Age-related differential timing of spring migration within sexes in passerines. The Wilson Bulletin, 114: 264-271.
Urquhart E., 2002 – Stonechats: a guide to the genus Saxicola. London: Christopher Helm.
Van Doren B. M., Liedvogel M. & Helm B., 2017 – Programmed and flexible: long-term Zugunruhe data highlight the many axes of variation in avian migratory behaviour. Journal of Avian Biology, 48: 155-172.
Vogt D. F., Hopey M. E., Mayfield G. R., Soehren E. C., Lewis L. M., Trent J. A. & Rush S. A., 2012 – Stopover site fidelity by Tennessee Warblers at a southern Appalachian high-elevation site. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 124: 366-370.
Ziegler G., 1966 – Beobachtungen an Schwarzkehlchen, Saxicola torquata rubicola, im nördlichen Teil des Kreises Minden/Westf. Journal für Ornithologie, 107, 187-200.

How to Cite



Protandry in a partially migrant population of the Stonechat (Saxicola rubicola): a field study in the central Apennines (Italy). (2025). Rivista Italiana Di Ornitologia, 95(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/rio.2025.860