Feathered diplomacy: when birds become main factors of research design and geography on Vigur Island
https://doi.org/10.4081/rio.2024.715
Accepted: 15 January 2024
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Vigur Island, situated in Iceland’s Westfjords, is renowned for its diverse avian species, such as Atlantic Puffins and Black Guillemots, and its marine inhabitants including Harbour and Grey Seals. Despite its openness to tourism, the island is a subject of ongoing conservation efforts. This opinion paper argues for a more holistic approach to research on the island, highlighting the complex interplay between human activity and the island’s ecosystem. It critiques the current, often narrow, research methodologies that fail to fully account for the intricate relationships between species and their environment. The paper calls for a re-evaluation of habitat classification to incorporate the significant impact of avian populations and stresses the importance of adhering to Icelandic laws that mandate minimal disturbance to wildlife. With seasonal closures and careful management practices like eiderdown collection, Vigur Island serves as a model for balancing human interests with ecological integrity. This opinion advocates for adaptable, comprehensive research strategies that, while illustrated through the case of Vigur, should be applied universally, urging scientists to embrace broader perspectives in environmental studies globally.
Alþingi, 64/1994 – Lög um vernd, friðun og veiðar á villtum fuglum og villtum spendýrum. [Act on the protection, preservation and hunting of wild birds and wild mammals]. <https://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/1994064.html> (accessed on 23rd October 2023). (In Icelandic).
Alþingi, 60/2013 – Lög um náttúruvernd [Nature Conservation Act]. <https://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/2013060.html> (accessed on 23rd October 2023). (In Icelandic).
Beale C. M. & Monaghan P., 2004 – Behavioural response to human disturbance: a matter of choice? Animal Behaviour, 68 (5): 1065-1069. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.002> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.002
Bötsch Y., Tablado Z. & Jenni L., 2017 – Experimental evidence of human recreational disturbance effects on bird-territory establishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284 (1858), 20170846. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0846> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0846
Carney K. M. & Sydeman W. J., 1999 – A Review of Human Disturbance Effects on Nesting Colonial Waterbirds. Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology, 22 (1): 68-79. <https://doi.org/10.2307/1521995> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1521995
Egevang C., Stenhouse I. J., Phillips R. A., Petersen A., Fox J. W. & Silk J. R. D., 2010 – Tracking of Arctic terns Sterna paradisaea reveals longest animal migration. PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (5): 2078-2081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909493107
Fontaine J. J. & Martin T. E., 2006 – Habitat Selection Responses of Parents to Offspring Predation Risk: An Experimental Test. The American Naturalist, 168 (6): 811-818. <https://doi.org/10.1086/508297> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/508297
Hansen E. S., 2019 – Stofnvöktun lunda 2017-2019. [Dust monitoring in Lund 2017-2019]. Náttúrustofa Suðurlands. (In Icelandic).
Milesi-Gaches D. & Lhériau A., 2022 – Census of breeding seabirds in Vigur Island, Westfjords, Iceland in 2021. Bird Census News, 35 (1): 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPL3WSX.v1
Ottósson J. O., Anna Sveinsdóttir A. & Harðardóttir M., 2016 – Vistgerðir á Íslandi. [Ecosystems in Iceland.] Fjölrit Náttúrufræðistofnunar, 54. <https://utgafa.ni.is/fjolrit/Fjolrit_54.pdf> (In Icelandic with an abstract in English).
Osinga N., Nussbaum S. B., Brakefield P. M. & Udo de Haes H. A., 2012 – Response of common seals (Phoca vitulina) to human disturbances in the Dollard estuary of the Wadden Sea. Mammalian Biology, 77 (4): 281-287. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.02.005> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.02.005
Renouf D., Lawson J. & Gaborko L., 1983 – Attachment between Harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) mothers and pups. Journal of Zoology, 199 (2): 179-187. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1983.tb02089.x> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1983.tb02089.x
Vigur Island, 2021 – Vigur island. <https://www.vigurisland.com>
Walsh P., Halley D.J., Harris M. P., del Nevo A., Sim I. M. W. & Tasker M. L., 1995 – Seabird monitoring handbook for Britain and Ireland. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Seabird Group, Peterborough.
Copyright (c) 2024 David Pierre Milesi-Gaches
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
