Antecedent description and depiction of the recently described cetacean behaviour of trap/tread-water feeding inferred from a nineteenth-century sighting of a ‘sea monster’ in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt


Submitted: 4 December 2023
Accepted: 28 February 2024
Published: 17 April 2024
Abstract Views: 625
PDF: 107
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In 2017 and 2018, two groups of biologists published papers in which they independently described what was referred to as a ‘novel’ or ‘new’ feeding behaviour for cetaceans. Called ‘trap’ or ‘tread-water’ feeding, the behaviour was of interest as it was the first time that passive or stationary in contrast to lunge, and vertical as opposed to horizontal position, feeding had been observed by whales. A subsequent historical ecology paper suggested that the recently described behaviour had in fact been previously observed and documented by illustrators and writers in Classical Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Because yesterday’s ‘sea monsters’ are today’s megafauna, recounted sightings of the former can provide early insight into whale behaviour. One such example is an 19th century sighting of a ‘sea monster’ in the Gulf of Suez, whose description and illustration are nearly identical to modern scientific reporting of whales engaged in trap/tread-water feeding. Such concordance is further evidence in support of a historical precedence with respect to observing and documenting this behaviour.


Alexander K. E., Leavenworth W. B., Willis T. V., Hall C., Mattocks S., Bittner S. M., Klien E., Staudinger M., Bryan A., Rosset J., Carr B. H. & Jordaan A., 2017 – Tambora and the mackerel year: Phenology and fisheries during an extreme climate event. Science Advances, 3 (1): 1-18. <https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601635> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601635

Andrews W. J., 1879 – A strange sea monster [Philomel, 1879]. The Graphic, 20, 522-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/020522b0

Anonymous, 2019 – Thermoregulation. Whales Online. <https://baleinesendirect.org/en/discover/life-of-whales/physiology/thermoregulation/#:~:text=This%20explains%20the%20pink%20colouration,to%20prevent%20a%20heat%20stroke!>

Anonymous, 2020 – What’s causing this pink minke’s rosy hue? It could be bellyflops. CBC News. <https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/pink-whale-long-beach-nl-1.5650764>

Brito C., Viera N. & Freitas J. G., 2019 – The wonder whale: A commodity, a monster, a show and an icon. Anthopozoologica, 54 (3): 13-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2019v54a3

Camuffo D., 2001 – Canaletto’s paintings open a window on the relative sea level rise in Venice. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2 (4): 227-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(01)01128-1

France R. L., 2016 – Reinterpreting nineteenth-century accounts of whales battling ‘sea serpents’ as an illation of early entanglement in pre-plastic fishing gear or maritime debris. International Journal of Maritime History, 28 (4): 686-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0843871416667434

France R. L., 2018 – Illustration of an 1857 ‘sea-serpent’ sighting reinterpreted as an early depiction of cetacean entanglement in maritime debris. Archives of Natural History, 45 (1): 111-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.2018.0486

France R. L., 2021a – Ethnozoology of Egede’s “most dreadful monster,” the foundational sea serpent. Contributions in Ethnobiology. Society of Ethnobiology.

France R. L., 2021b – The monstrous Anthropocene: Imaginary ‘sea serpents’ from the ‘Dark Continent’ reveal an earlier baseline for real environmental impacts to African marine life. Anthropocenes. Human, Inhuman, Posthuman, 2 (1), 3. <https://doi.org/10.16997/ahip.931> DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/ahip.931

France R. L., in press – A “sea monster” depicted in Ortelius’s Theatrum orbis terrarum (c. 1592) may exemplify spy-hopping behavior in cetaceans. Archives of Natural History, 51.

Galbreath G. J., 2015 – The 1848 ‘enormous serpent’ of the Daedalus identified. The Skeptical Inquirer, 39 (5): 42-46.

Gladstone W. & Fisher P. R., 2000 – Status and ecology of cetaceans in the Farasan Islands marine protected area (Red Sea). Fauna of Arabia, 18: 385-396.

Gould C., 1886 – Mythical monsters. W. H. Allen, London, UK.

Guidetti P. & Micheli F., 2011 – Ancient art serving marine conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9 (7): 374-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/11.WB.019

Hendrikx S., 2018 – Monstrosities from the sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner’s (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters. Anthropozoolgica, 53 (11): 125-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2018v53a11

Heuvelmans B., 19658 – In the wake of the sea-serpents. Hill and Wang, New York.

Iwata T., Akamatsu T., Thongsukdee S., Cherdsukjai P., Adulyanukosol K. & Sato K., 2017 – Tread-water feeding of Bryde’s whales. Current Biology, 27 (21): R1154-R1155. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.045> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.045

Jaffe A., 2013 – Sea monsters in antiquity: a classical and zoological investigation. Berkeley Undergraduate Journal of Classics, 1 (2): 1-12.

Lehn W. H., 1981 – The Norse merman as an optical phenomenon. Nature, 289: 362-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/289362a0

Lehn W. H. & Schroeder I. I., 20022003 – Hafgerdingar: A mystery from the King’s Mirror explained. Polar Record, 39 (3): 211-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247403002924

Lehn W. H. & Schroeder I. I., 2004 – The hafstramb and margygr of the King’s Mirror: an analysis. Polar Record, 40 (2): 121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247403003255

Lyons S. L., 2009 – Species, serpents, spirits, and skulls. Science at the margins in the Victorian Age. SUNY Press.

Lu D., 2023 – Ancient texts shed new light on mysterious whale behaviour that ‘captured imagination’. The Guardian, 28/02/2023.

Mazzoldi C., Bearzi G., Brito C., Carvalho I., Desidera E., Endrizzi L., Freitas L., Giacomello E., Giovos I., Guidetti P. & Ressurreicao A., 2019 – From sea monsters to charismatic megafauna: Changes in perception and use of large marine animals. PLOS One, 14 (2), e0226810. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226810> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226810

McCarthy J., Sebo E. & Firth M., 2023a – Parallels for cetacean trap feeding and tread-water feeding in the historical record across two millennia. Marine Mammal Science, 2023: 1-12 39 (3): 830-841. <https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.13009> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.13009

McCarthy J., Sebo E. & Firth M., 2023b – A ‘recently discovered’ whale feeding strategy has turned up in 2,000-year-old texts about fearsome sea monsters. The Conversation, Feb 28. <https://theconversation.com/a-recently-discovered-whale-feeding-strategy-has-turned-up-in-2-000-year-old-texts-about-fearsome-sea-monsters-200724>

McClenachan L., 2015 – Viewpoint from a practitioner: The detective work of historical ecology – new technologies enhance but cannot replace archival research. In: Marine historical ecology in conservation: Applying the past to manage for the future. Kittinger J. N., McClenachan L., Gedan K. B. & Blight L. K. (eds.). University of California Press: 122.

McMillan C. J., Towers J. R. & Hildering J., 2018 – The innovation and diffusion of “trap feeding,” a novel humpback whale foraging strategy. Marine Mammal Science, 35 (3): 779-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12557

Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Kerem D., Smeenk C., Rudolph P., Cesario A., Costa M., Elasar M., Feingold D., Fumagalli M., Goffman O., Hadar N., Mebrathu Y. T. & Scheinin A., 2017 – Cetaceans of the Red Sea. CMS Technical Series, 33.

Papadopoulos J. K. & Ruscillo D., 2002 – A Ketos in early Athens: an archaeology of whales and sea monsters in the Greek world. American Journal of Archaeology, 106 (2): 187-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4126243

Parsons E. C. M., 2004 – Sea monsters and mermaids in Scottish folklore: can these tales give us information on the historic occurrence of marine animals in Scotland? Anthrozoös, 17 (1): 73-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/089279304786991936

Pauly D., 1995 – Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10 (10): 430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89171-5

Paxton C. G. M., Knatterud E. & Hedley S. L., 2005 – Cetaceans, sex and sea serpents: An analysis of the Egede accounts of a ‘most dreadful monster’ seen off the coast of Greenland in 1734. Archives of Natural History, 32 (1): 1-9. <http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/anh.2005.32.1.1> DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.2005.32.1.1

Stothers R. B., 2004 – Ancient scientific basis of the “great serpent” from historical evidence. Isis, 95 (2): 220-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/426195

Szabo V. E., 2008 – Monstrous fishes and the mead-dark sea. Whaling in the medieval North Atlantic. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163980.i-326

Westrum R., 1979 – Knowledge about sea serpents. In: On the margins of science: the social construction of rejected knowledge. Wallis R. (ed.). University of Keele: 293-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1979.tb00066.x

Whitaker I., 1986 – North Atlantic sea-creatures in the King’s Mirror (Konung’s Skugsja). Polar Record, 23 (142): 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400006756

France, R. L. (2024). Antecedent description and depiction of the recently described cetacean behaviour of trap/tread-water feeding inferred from a nineteenth-century sighting of a ‘sea monster’ in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Natural History Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/nhs.2024.741

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations