Living with the enemy: activity rhythms of the red fox Vulpes vulpes (Carnivora, Canidae) and some potential preys in an urban environment


Submitted: 11 June 2021
Accepted: 10 November 2021
Published: 18 March 2022
Abstract Views: 1360
PDF: 640
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The present study aimed at investigating the activity rhythms of the red fox Vulpes vulpes and three potential preys (i.e. the European hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus, the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus, and the Norway rat Rattus norvegicus) in an urban environment. Data were collected as a part of a camera trapping survey, carried out within the municipality of Padua (northeastern Italy). In order to analyse species activity patterns, the R overlap package was used and then the Watson-Wheeler test was run to evaluate whether two overlaps were significantly different. Results show that all the investigated species have nocturnal activities, with “moderate” temporal activity overlap between the red fox and its potential prey. The Watson-Wheeler test showed that the hedgehog was the only potential prey that did not show significant differences in the hours of activity compared to those of the red fox. Instead, statistically significant differences were recorded when the activity rhythm of the red fox was compared with that of the wood mouse or the Norway rat. This may indicate the development of antipredator behaviour or the possibility that the red fox is seeking anthropogenic food sources instead of wild prey or, alternatively, other preferred food items.


Nardotto, A. (2022). Living with the enemy: activity rhythms of the red fox <em>Vulpes vulpes</em> (Carnivora, Canidae) and some potential preys in an urban environment. Natural History Sciences, 9(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.4081/nhs.2022.555

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations